/teal-sea
teal-sea / zeta-labstate of record · compiled 02 Nov 2026 · revision b09fa4dd · source

Library · docs/README.md

The documents

1,589 words · 87 lines · source

Forty-nine numbered documents. The first five are a single argument and are meant to be read in order; everything after 14 is a record of a particular piece of work and can be read on its own.

docs/doors/ is a different thing: one short page per audience (learn, refute, certify, discover, contribute, adopt) plus one per department. Start there if you want a task rather than a subject.

A bare docs/NN reference anywhere in this tree always means the document with that number, and tests/test_docs_numbering.py fails if two documents claim one number, if a heading disagrees with its own filename, or if a citation points at a document that does not exist.

The course

00 → 01 → 02 → 03 → 04 is one argument: theta is the heat kernel, Poisson summation gives its modular identity, the Mellin transform turns that into the functional equation whose mirror axis is Re(s) = 1/2, and the explicit formula rebuilds the primes from the zeros.

DocOne line
00The statement, the stakes, the status, and the honest scope of this whole repo.
01Euler–Maclaurin continues ζ by hand; how ζ(−1) = −1/12 is forced, not chosen.
02Theta as the heat kernel; Poisson summation; θ(1/x) = √x·θ(x) in one line.
03The Mellin bridge: modularity in, ξ(s) = ξ(1−s) out, derived line by line.
04Zeros ↔ primes as an identity: ψ(x) as a sum of waves, one per zero.
05Heat flow on Ξ; zero collisions; Λ ∈ [0, 0.2] and RH ⟺ Λ = 0.
06The spectral dream and the Montgomery–Odlyzko law, measured on your laptop.
07A catalogue of statements exactly equivalent to RH, and why equivalence is not progress.
08The failure catalogue: what each known technique provably cannot do.
09What "RH needs new mathematics" actually means, with the Weil precedent.
10The Weil explicit formula as a trace formula; Selberg's working analogue; Connes' program.
11The field with one element, Deninger's dynamics, and the hunt for geometry under ℤ.
12Eight problems that fell, the mechanism that killed each, and an honest scoring of RH against the board.
13External zero/value tables, finite-moment estimation, error separation, and the theorem-gated scorecard.
14Eleven recurring ways new mathematics has appeared, scored against the missing Frobenius over ℤ.

The record

What was built, what was measured, and what did not survive.

DocOne line
15The F1 discovery engine: prime orbits, a cohomology scaffold, and what it could not reach.
16Poisson-summation cokernel: the implementation blueprint.
17The falsification harness: how five claims died in one day.
18Five longshots, each run to the wall that stopped it.
19Research dossiers: an experiment in AI-native mathematical state.
20Verification integrity: the referee, refereed.
21Forward-deployed verification: can a report refuse a crossing?
22Detection strength of RH equivalences, stress-tested against the Davenport-Heilbronn imposter.
23Rival distance and detector independence: closing two declared blind spots.
24The local positivity attempt, run to its wall.
25The director run: the laboratory pointed at itself, and six of its own claims died.
26The adopted builds: the decision of 2026-08-11, made runnable.
27State of the transplant: what is kernel-checked, what is refuted, what is open.
28E0: the independent checker reproduced the audit's blind spots exactly. Read its correction notice.
29The de Bruijn-Newman constant of the Davenport-Heilbronn function.
30The rightmost zeros of the prime zeta function.
31Erratum to Bian, Lemma 12: C_{kappa,2} is -4 kappa, not -4.
32The Palomar arm: what an outside mechanical check adds, and what it does not.
33Pitch classes against the colour wheel.
34The Riemann zeros in tuning units.
35The unspent fact: what out-of-band positivity is worth, and why nobody can claim it. Superseded 2026-09-06: hunt #118 closed it as a ceiling, the worth is zero to any unconditional certificate, and the page carries the correction inline.
36Thirteen worked demonstrations, the figure gallery, the repository map, and the standing limitations.
37The methods index: every reusable identity, lemma, control and technique the hunts produced, with grade and provenance.
38The quasi-Riemann claim: OpenAI's 7/8 zero-free half-plane of 2026-10-06, read against this tree, rebuilt here and accepted by two kernels.
39Start here for the current results. Five results built on the 7/8 half-plane: a prime between consecutive seventh powers (with an explicit density estimate; audited by a separate agent, reviewed by no person), a prime between consecutive ninth powers from the half-plane alone, class numbers up to 1500, small witnesses with constant 1, Linnik's exponent 7/3.
40One form per discriminant: a composite-defect table whose hypothesis a(1) = 1 fails on 27 of its 41 rows, the check that would have caught it, and the eleven overclaims an adversarial audit found in the write-up of that finding (hunt #127; the repair to doc 34 landed in #296).
41The module that missed the guard: the Epstein evaluator's failure surface in height and precision before #291, a loss derived rather than fitted, and a guard an adversary walked straight through because every rung of its fault ladder varied the wrong thing (hunt #129; the precision lift that fixed the routine landed in #291).
42A law read off a diagonal: an elementary certificate barrier measured on a grid instead of a diagonal, a headline withdrawn when an adversary noticed the model comparison was not like for like, and the zero-weight cells that turn out to be what holds the excess up (hunt #130).
43What happens to a claim after it is recorded: a measurement of this laboratory rather than of zeta, how much of the record has a guard behind it, how rarely a correction installs one, and a correction rate withdrawn when a blind audit scored the classifier near chance and re-earned on a disjoint sample (hunt #131).
44The constant in the wedge: explicit constants for Holland's Jensen hyperbolicity wedge (K = 17 900 with GORTTW's corollary, 9.10e19 without) and c = 1 in GORTTW's theorem, the earlier deposits that claimed the 2/3 wedge first, the Davenport-Heilbronn rival the construction cannot tell from zeta, and a test suite that claimed more than it checked (hunt #135). Nothing in it bears on RH.
45RH to height 100, kernel-checked by Lean and independently accepted by con-ron --verified on the exported whole closure: every zero of Mathlib's riemannZeta in the open strip with 0 < Im rho <= 100 is on the critical line and simple, exactly 29 distinct zeros (hunt #137). Nothing above 100 or about RH itself. Earlier height-50 and docs/39 results retained.
46Same-verifier Arb replay of Berzai's Davenport-Heilbronn v6 census (Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.23585903): 400/400 windows and 1,268/1,268 listed zeros recomputed with an Arb outward majorant replacing the one binary64 bound, zero failures, 27,614 zeros below height 20,000 reproduced. Not an independent implementation; limits and a receipt audit with planted lesions included.
47The Davenport-Heilbronn zero, kernel-checked: davenport_heilbronn_strip proves in one statement that some entire function with the Davenport-Heilbronn Dirichlet series and functional equation has a zero s with 0 < Re s < 1 and Re s ≠ 1/2 (the witness is DH); it bundles dh_analytic_half (DH is entire, with zeta's kind of series and functional equation) and dh_zero_located (a zero of DH in the closed square of half-width 3/64 about 0.808517 + 85.699348 i), and dh_separation_hundred adds that below height 100 Mathlib's riemannZeta has no such zero; zero sorry and only the three standard axioms over 215 generated ball-arithmetic sites (hunt #145). The assembly's davenport_heilbronn : davenport_heilbronn_statement is weaker: the statement, as defined, is also met by the trivial zero s = -1 (lean/ZetaLean/DHTrivialZero.lean), so it carries none of this. A fresh replay of the whole closure by Lean's own kernel accepted it (leanchecker --fresh, 2026-10-27), and the independent con-ron --verified accepted the dependency closure of the 18 final declarations split site by site (216 shards, same day). Pending external verification: no outside review yet. Nothing about RH.
48The Weil functional's degeneracy: three measurements (hunts #155, #156, #157) of how W sits against its norm, the constraint they put on a proof, and a prior-art scan with three PARTIAL verdicts. Nothing in it is evidence for RH.

Adding one

Take the next free number from scripts/science_preflight.py rather than guessing it: two documents once shared number 21 because a session working from a snapshot could not see the tree it was writing into. Give the file an H1 of the form # NN. Title matching its own filename, and add a row here.