Read first: hunts/weil_propagation/MISSION.md, AGENTS.md (certainty ladder, original vs novel), ALIGNMENT.md, then hunts/rogue_frontier/weil_trunc/RESULTS.md and THEOREM_FEASIBILITY.md (the Davenport-Heilbronn negativity at c = 31), and docs/24, docs/35.
Question
Is there any known or constructible mechanism by which positivity of the Weil form on window L, together with the Euler product, forces positivity on window L + delta? What does the literature already know about how positivity or the ground state changes with the window?
Tasks, in order
- Primary sources, read and cite with arXiv IDs and section numbers: Connes-Consani semilocal trace formula and "Weil positivity and trace formula, the archimedean place"; Connes-Consani-Moscovici (arXiv:2511.22755); Connes-van Suijlekom (arXiv:2511.23257); Connes (arXiv:2602.04022) s6; arXiv:2608.24827 (support-1.6 positivity and the doubly exponential decay law); Yoshida's original result. Summarize only what each proves about dependence on the window, the role of each prime entering, and where each program says it is stuck.
- Write down the exact derivative or difference of the form in L: the archimedean change, the new prime-power atoms entering at n = e^L, and the effect on the admissible function space. Derive, don't recall; check any constant numerically with the lab's
zeta/weil.pywhere cheap. - Propose at most three candidate propagation lemmas. For each: exact statement, what it would imply, where the Euler product enters, and the DH test (DH must violate the lemma's hypothesis or conclusion at the c = 30 -> 31 crossing, otherwise the lemma is refuted as stated).
- For each candidate, give the smallest check the numerics worker could run, and say whether it is a restatement of RH with no new estimate.
Output
Write only in hunts/weil_propagation/theory/: RESULTS.md with sources, derivations, candidates and their status on the certainty ladder. Commit to this branch in small commits. Do not push. No heavy computation; nothing over a few minutes locally. No lake build.
Finish with a five-line summary at the top of RESULTS.md: strongest candidate, what it would give, what refutes it, whether it is new or known (state what was searched), next step.