The white-box attack does not withdraw URMS2-051: the load-bearing new step saturates to four significant figures as W/U grows from 1.3 to 9.9, but the record's falsification control violates the hypothesis of the step it supports, gate 6's independent route shares its entire numerical substrate, and the four recorded margins do not select 51/100.
hunts/r_065f29 (Record 26 of 98 in chronological sequence)
Guiding Question
does a white-box attack on the URMS2-051 claim, seeing the author's reasoning and hunting the recorded checklist, find a fault that survives checking
Method & Verification
The eight-entry WHITEBOX_CHECKLIST was run against the author's coefficient family, evaluating the exact block second moment as a closed-form double sum while W/U varies at fixed x, plus a one-part-in-10^6 mutation of the shared tail majorant.
Lineage & Relationships
Primary Sources (at pin 8fa46e134)
Editorial Notes
Case-log status is settled as an attack, not as a verdict. Disposition is qualified for that split: the claim is not withdrawn and the apparatus around it is weaker than the record reads. Question kept in the HuntSpec's original lowercase.
Date Provenance
commit 4aa8afaa2eec012748c60b5c50295a162da49571, hunts/r_065f29/RESULTS.md, author 2026-08-16T14:11:30-05:00