(git-record date, not publication date)
completed
measured
audit
verified
A blind attack found no structural failure in the URMS2 0.51 bandwidth claim: the Montgomery-Vaughan off-diagonal spacing cost stays dominated by the diagonal, so the claim survives.
hunts/r_fb9c81 (Record 23 of 98 in chronological sequence)
Guiding Question
Does a blind attack find a structural or analytic failure in the URMS2 0.51 bandwidth claim, without access to the author's reasoning?
Method & Verification
A numerical probe on a scaled configuration (x=1000, alpha=0.51, delta=0.75) compared the exact polynomial spacing cost sum n |c_n|^2 against the diagonal mass U log x, without using the author's reasoning.
Lineage & Relationships
Primary Sources (at pin 8fa46e134)
Editorial Notes
Case-log status is settled and the analytical assumption holds structurally. Disposition maps settled to completed, matching batch 1. This is an attack that found no fault, not a promotion of the claim.
Date Provenance
commit 1b942cb7eecb3c5492e0e2e84413557ffe47c56b, hunts/r_fb9c81/RESULTS.md, author 2026-08-15T16:03:59-05:00